SkipNavigation


Primary navigation


SecondaryNavigation

Using data from Multidimensional Pain Inventory subscales to assess functioning in pain rehabilitation

Harlacher, Uwe; Persson, Ann L.; Rivano-Fischer, Marcelo; Sjölund, Bengt H.: Using data from Multidimensional Pain Inventory subscales to assess functioning in pain rehabilitation. - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, vol. 34, no. 1, 2011: p. 14-21.
An examination of whether Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) subscale score changes can be used for monitoring interdisciplinary cognitive behavioural pain rehabilitation programmes.

Author: Harlacher, Uwe | Persson, Ann L. | Rivano-Fischer, Marcelo | Sjölund, Bengt H.

RCT Author: Uwe Harlacher, Ann Persson

RCT Author (No longer employed at RCT): Bengt H. Sjölund

[Abstract]: The aim of this study was to examine whether Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) subscale score changes can be used for monitoring interdisciplinary cognitive behavioural pain rehabilitation programmes, using the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) index as an independent variable of rehabilitation outcome. Data from 434 consecutively referred patients disabled by chronic pain were analysed. The intervention was a 4-week interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation group programme (5 h/day), based on biopsychosocial and cognitive behavioural principles. Mean PGWB total scores improved after rehabilitation (P<0.0001) with clinically relevant effect sizes for patients with 'dysfunctional' and 'interpersonally distressed' MPI profiles. Substantial correlations (r=0.7-0.3; P<0.001) were found between the changes in PGWB total scores and four of the MPI subscale scores. These were combined into a composite variable ['pain severity', 'interference', 'life control' (given reversed scores) and 'affective distress'], and were labelled as the Pain Rehabilitation Index. The subscales, 'support' and 'general activity level', were omitted, as changes were ambiguous with respect to functioning. 'Dysfunctional' and 'interpersonally distressed' profile patients showed a marked improvement in Pain Rehabilitation Index after rehabilitation (effect sizes of 0.77 and 0.43; P<0.0001, respectively). Conversely, the 'adaptive copers' may have deteriorated somewhat (effect size -0.28; P=0.036). We propose that scores from four MPI subscales are integrated and the difference pre-post rehabilitation is used to indicate composite rehabilitation outcomes, making it possible to interpret all included MPI subscales in the same direction. Psychometric evaluation of the index is warranted

    Newsletter_megaphone346

    Subscribe to the RCT newsletter

    News

    Get in touch

    RCT
    Rehabilitation and
    Research Centre for
    Torture Victims  

    Borgergade 13
    PO Box 2107
    DK - 1014 København K
    Map

    Join the conversation

    Join us in the conversation on how to prevent torture and practice rehabilitation

    Support us

    RCT is a private institution dependent on economic support from donors. Please consider to support our research and international projects.

    Read more about donations

    Donate directly here

    Stay informed

    Enter your email address here to keep up to date with news on our latest research and projects.