Using data from Multidimensional Pain Inventory subscales to assess functioning in pain rehabilitation
Harlacher, Uwe; Persson, Ann L.; Rivano-Fischer, Marcelo; Sjölund, Bengt H.: Using data from Multidimensional Pain Inventory subscales to assess functioning in pain rehabilitation. - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, vol. 34, no. 1, 2011: p. 14-21.
An examination of whether Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) subscale score changes can be used for monitoring interdisciplinary cognitive behavioural pain rehabilitation programmes.
Author: Harlacher, Uwe | Persson, Ann L. | Rivano-Fischer, Marcelo | Sjölund, Bengt H.
RCT Author: Uwe Harlacher,
Ann PerssonRCT Author (No longer employed at RCT): Bengt H. Sjölund
[Abstract]: The aim of this study was to examine whether
Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) subscale score changes can be
used for monitoring interdisciplinary cognitive behavioural pain
rehabilitation programmes, using the Psychological General
Well-Being (PGWB) index as an independent variable of
rehabilitation outcome. Data from 434 consecutively referred
patients disabled by chronic pain were analysed. The intervention
was a 4-week interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation group programme
(5 h/day), based on biopsychosocial and cognitive behavioural
principles. Mean PGWB total scores improved after rehabilitation
(P<0.0001) with clinically relevant effect sizes for patients
with 'dysfunctional' and 'interpersonally distressed' MPI profiles.
Substantial correlations (r=0.7-0.3; P<0.001) were found between
the changes in PGWB total scores and four of the MPI subscale
scores. These were combined into a composite variable ['pain
severity', 'interference', 'life control' (given reversed scores)
and 'affective distress'], and were labelled as the Pain
Rehabilitation Index. The subscales, 'support' and 'general
activity level', were omitted, as changes were ambiguous with
respect to functioning. 'Dysfunctional' and 'interpersonally
distressed' profile patients showed a marked improvement in Pain
Rehabilitation Index after rehabilitation (effect sizes of 0.77 and
0.43; P<0.0001, respectively). Conversely, the 'adaptive copers'
may have deteriorated somewhat (effect size -0.28; P=0.036). We
propose that scores from four MPI subscales are integrated and the
difference pre-post rehabilitation is used to indicate composite
rehabilitation outcomes, making it possible to interpret all
included MPI subscales in the same direction. Psychometric
evaluation of the index is warranted