Philippines close to prohibit torture by law
Hopes are high after the Senate June 1st 2009 passed the anti-torture bill.
The Philippine Senate is approving a bill
penalizing torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment
of suspected criminals. With the freedom from torture legislations
approved in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, all
that is needed for the enactment of a law prohibiting torture is a
bicameral session and the signature of President Arroyo. Under the
bill, detainees must not be subjected to physical, psychological,
mental or pharmacological harm, force, violence, threat or
intimidation or any act that impairs their free will or in any
manner demeans or degrades their human dignity.
The Senate speeded up the approval of the anti-torture bill, that
has been pending for more than 10 years, after the Philippines came
under fire at the United Nations for dragging its feet on the
measure, which is in line with the UN Convention Against Torture,
to which the country is a signatory since 1986. In May 2009, the UN
Committee against Torture expressed its great concern on a number
of points. Among other the numerous, ongoing, credible and
consistent allegations of routine and widespread use of torture and
ill-treatment of suspects in police custody, is of great concern.
Also credible allegations indicate a climate of impunity where
torture and/or ill-treatment committed by law enforcement and
military services personnel seldom are investigated and prosecuted.
Finally the continued extrajudicial killings and enforced
disappearances is a cause of worry.
Ellecer Ebro Carlos from RCT partner organisation BALAY comments on
the ongoing process:
"The next and final step will still be a challenge for human rights
advocates here in the Philippines who are assisting the senators
and congressmen. But hopes are very high that our efforts will pay
off within the 14th congress. BALAY Rehabilitation Center, together
with other human rights organizations will continue to be at the
frontline of this process in order to ensure that the good
safeguards and restitution measures remain in the final version as
well as seeing to it that additional provisions are inserted to
strengthen the end product".
It is expected that different bodies simultaneously will push for
the inclusion of the Istanbul Protocol which will oblige the
government to investigate and document incidents of torture and
other forms of ill-treatment and to punish those responsible in a
comprehensive, effective, prompt and impartial manner.
Naming and defining the offence of torture in accordance with the
CAT convention and thus alerting everyone, including perpetrators,
victims, and the public, to the special gravity of the crime of
torture is expected to have a deterrent effect itself.
Additionally, it will create a valuable foundation for future
dialogs between the National Preventive Mechanism, that is the
mechanism for regular monitoring visits to all places where people
are deprived their liberty, and government agencies when the
optional protocol to the convention (OPCAT) is to come into force
domestically.
Written by Heidi K. Tokle